One aspect in its favor in the matter of compatibility is that, for example, we do not get these gray boxes that usually appear in LibreOffice and that replace 'a space' when we open. The above is not really a big problem What is a problem is that on some occasions, when in a document written in Microsoft Office, we have one page, then when viewing it in Kingsoft Office we have two and this is probably due to the number of pixels that Kingsoft office uses to separate one line and another is slightly larger.

I have noticed for example in the case of the well-known Arial font that it is slightly different. Now speaking of compatibility with proprietary Microsoft Office formats, it is true that it is a little (slightly) better in this aspect than LibreOffice but it does not reach a 99% compatibility as some claim. Leaving aside my opinion, it must be borne in mind that the client is always right and in this sense Kingsoft Office plays an important role in convincing my clients to migrate to GNU / Linux since they realize that here we have what you need. I certainly do not agree since I consider that the Ribbon interface is not viable in terms of usability since it requires many more clicks and wastes too much vertical space for my taste. Some of the complaints of my clients is that they do not have a suite at the height of Microsoft Office, since they consider that the interface for example of LibreOffice is very outdated. I had already told you a problem that I had in Kingsoft Office (or wps office, whatever you want to call it) that I have solved with ease, and now it is time to give my opinion on this new alternative.

Openoffice vs libreoffice vs kingsoft